CIRIS has a new look. Visit the new site →

Annex C

Regulatory Cross-Walk


ANNEX C REGULATORY CROSS‑WALK (v 1.3-RC2)

Purpose

Map CIRIS clauses to major external standards to simplify dual compliance. This annex carries two layers:

  1. The operational cross-walk (live, evidence-bearing) — the CIRISAgent compliance/ directory: 27 stable dimensions (D01–D27) cross-walked at paragraph grain against four institutionally-distinct senior frameworks (Magnifica Humanitas · EU HLEG Trustworthy AI Guidelines · IEEE Ethically Aligned Design · ASEAN AI Governance Guide), with per-dimension implementation references and dated, script-generated baselines. See Addendum 1 for the binding and the evidence discipline.
  2. The statutory mapping (informative) — the table below, mapping CIRIS structures to binding-law and standards frameworks. These rows are informative engineering correspondences, not legal opinions; statutory rows graduate to "verified" status only upon legal review. Annex I carries the operative legal-alignment procedures (data-protection mapping, sector overlays, liability matrix, escalation feeds).
External FrameworkRelevant Articles / ClausesCIRIS Mapping (Book / Annex §)Status
EU AI Act (2024)Art 9 Risk ManagementBook II §II (PDMA); Annex D CREInformative
Art 12 Record-KeepingBook IV Ch 3 audit trails; Annex F §4Informative
Art 13 TransparencyBook II §II Step 6; Book IV Ch 3Informative
Art 14 Human Oversight (incl. 14(4))Book II §III (WBD); Annex F authority lattice + autonomy tiersInformative
Art 61 Post-Market MonitoringAnnex H drift controls + continuous auditInformative
NIST AI RMF 1.0Govern → Map → Measure → ManageGovern: Books I, VI; Map: Book II §II Steps 1–2; Measure: Annex A metrics + Annex H baselines; Manage: Annex F/H workflowsInformative
ISO/IEC 42001Cl 6.2 Risk AssessmentBook II §IIInformative
Annex A controlsCIRISAgent compliance/ dimension docs (per-control correspondence pending)Informative
OSHA Robotics GuidelinesSec 5.E Safety AuditsAnnex D CREPartial
EU HLEG Trustworthy AI (2019)7 RequirementsOperational cross-walk, dimensions D01–D27Evidence-bearing
IEEE EAD 1st ed. (2019)8 General PrinciplesOperational cross-walk, dimensions D01–D27Evidence-bearing
ASEAN AI Governance Guide (2024)7 Principles; HITL/HOTL/HOOTLOperational cross-walk; Annex F autonomy tiersEvidence-bearing
Magnifica Humanitas (2026)245 ¶¶ (paragraph-grain mapping)Operational cross-walk, dimensions D01–D27Evidence-bearing

Graduation rule

A statutory row moves from Informative to Verified when qualified legal review confirms the correspondence for a named jurisdiction and the review artifact is linked from this table. Until then, rows in this annex support engineering alignment and gap analysis, not compliance claims; per the Introduction's Liability section, compliance claims are void where prohibited by applicable law.

(Additional frameworks — UNESCO Recommendation on AI Ethics, OECD AI Principles, Council of Europe Framework Convention — are queued for the operational cross-walk per the compliance directory roadmap.)


End of Annex C

On this page