CIRIS has a new look. Visit the new site β†’
ကစာမျက်နှာကို α€…α€€α€Ία€˜α€¬α€žα€¬α€•α€Όα€”α€Ία€†α€­α€―α€‘α€¬α€Έα€žα€Šα€Ία‹ တစ်ခုခု α€™α€Ύα€¬α€Έα€–α€α€Ία€›α€•α€«α€€αŠ issue တင်ပေးပါ β€” repo α€žα€Šα€Ί ထကြောင်းရင်းကြောင့် α€‘α€™α€»α€¬α€Έα€•α€Όα€Šα€Ία€žα€° α€–α€Όα€…α€Ία€žα€Šα€Ία‹ α€˜α€¬α€žα€¬α€•α€Όα€”α€Ία€†α€­α€―α€α€»α€€α€Ί ပြဿနာ တင်ပြပါ

← lobby α€žα€­α€―α€· α€•α€Όα€”α€Ία€žα€½α€¬α€Έα€•α€«

Safety Β· Stewardship and lifecycle

More power means more scrutiny.

The more capable and autonomous a system is, the more oversight the protocol demands. That is written into the rules, not left to good intentions.

Every agent is given a stewardship tier that ties its duties to its creator's influence and its worst-case risk.

Large training runs trigger a catastrophic-risk evaluation with independent red-team audits and kill-switch checks.

Autonomy tiers from A0 to A4 set the oversight for each action. Anything lethal or irreversible needs a hardware interlock and a live human yes.

This page is growing.

The ultimate backstop is the human halt-authority.

See the kill switch β†’

CIRISsafe by structure Β· open by principle Β· kind by design