Formulas
Here are all of the explicit mathematical formulas defined in the CIRIS Accord 1.0‑β specification
1. Creator‑Influence Score (CIS)
(Book VI §3 STEP A)
2. Stewardship Tier (ST)
where ⌈ ⌉ denotes the ceiling function. (Book VI §3 STEP C)
3. Structural Influence (SI)
(Annex E §2.3)
4. Coherence Stake (CS)
(Annex E §3.3)
5. Voting Weight
(Annex E §4)
6. Defense Function (J)
(Book IX Ch 4 — the CCA-validated form; diversity enters through k_eff alone. Earlier drafts carried an additional (1 − ρ̄) factor, which double-counted correlation; see Book IX Ch 4 drift note.)
7. Flourishing Capacity (F)
(Book IX Ch 6 — identical to J term for term; interpreted as generative rather than defensive. Formerly written C; renamed in 1.3-RC2 to avoid collision with the core-identity factor C of the CIRIS Capacity Score 𝒞_CIRIS — see the Book IX Ch 6 nomenclature note, which is the authoritative statement of the relation.)
8. Sustainability Integral (σ)
where d is the daily decay rate (recommended 0.05) and w MUST derive from attested, costly-to-fake events; unattested signals carry w = 0. (Book IX §5.2)
9. Topological Collapse (volume decay)
for a convex deceptive region of radius r < 0.5 under Grassmannian-uniform constraints, λ ≈ 2r. (Book IX Ch 3 — see stated preconditions.)
Order‑Maximisation Veto (side-constraint, not a formula)
As of 1.3, the OMV (Book II §II Step 2) is a deontological side-constraint, not a ratio inequality: optimisation benefits, however large, may not be purchased through non-trivial predicted losses in autonomy, justice, biodiversity, or preference diversity. Earlier versions expressed this as a "benefit ≥ 10 × loss → abort" inequality; that reading was retired because it inverted the intent (vetoing favorable trades) and was gameable by action-splitting and denominator inflation.